The best evidence rule can be traced back to 18th-century
Great Britain and continues to be part of many legal systems, including the
United States'. The original purpose of the rule was to prevent altered
evidence, whether intentionally altered or accidentally altered, from being
admitted in a court of law as evidence. Although the best evidence rule
continues to be a part of the current United States federal Rules of Evidence,
the original purpose has become somewhat obsolete and its practical application
is complicated in the electronic age.
The best evidence rule was originally needed because, prior
to the digital age, copies of documents were made by hand. Clearly, errors were
commonly made. In addition, the person who made the copy was often the same
person who wished to admit the document into court as evidence. As such,
intentional "errors" were often made when the error was to the
benefit of the person making the copy. The legal solution to this problem was
to require an original to be produced when a party wished to admit a document
into court as evidence.
The original justification for the best evidence rule does
not exist to the extent that it once did. Most copies are made by a facsimile
machine that cannot make errors in the same way that a person copying the
document by hand would. Copies of video, recording or photos are also not
subject to the same concerns about tampering that an 18th century document once
was.
While the purpose of the best evidence rule has become more
difficult to justify, applying the rule has also become complicated. With the
vast majority of communication now being accomplished through electronic means
and the average person regularly using video and sound to record events,
determining that a piece of evidence is the original has become time-consuming
and expensive. Verifying that a video or sound recording has not been tampered
with can require an expert analysis, which takes a considerable amount of time
and money. E-mail or text messages are equally difficult to authenticate as
originals, yet they comprise the vast majority of communication in the digital
world.
blog ni boleh buat sumber rujukan buat assignment nanti..hehehe...thanx bro
ReplyDelete-UiTM Law Student-
info menarik..
ReplyDeletesenang ada blog macam ini, nak cari bahan pun mudah..terima kasih atas maklumat..teruskan